Friday, April 25, 2008

sun 27 april.2008 - (23)*******************




///////////////////


various artists - !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

******************

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Lefsetz [mailto:bob@lefsetz.com]

Subject: The Yetnikoff Interview


His book may have been a disappointment, but this interview is
FANTASTIC!

Don't get bogged down in his defense of payola. Utterly ridiculous. If
you don't think the independent gatekeeper game was payola, then you
were an attorney advising these people how to skate between the lines of
the law. But, after giving his insight into Frederic Dannen and "Hit
Men", Walter goes off on BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN!

Why did he need all that money? Can he really blame his lawyer and his
attorney? Does that play when you're fifty seven years old?

As for Bruce's records... The last three suck, and "The Rising" was not
a call to action and by the way, the last Bon Jovi record WAS BAD TOO!

Shit, who is this guy speaking English in a business where the insider
press says everything's groovy and the executives are superstars? Sure,
Walter's not in the game, so it's easier to speak the truth, but AT
LEAST HE'S SPEAKING THE TRUTH!

I love it when he says the majors, which don't really exist, would wave
a magic wand and get rid of the Internet if they could. And what about
Guy Hands running EMI? A hit record is the solution to Warner's
problems, not some new technology.

Sure, he takes a shot at Donnie and Michele, and Tommy too. But give
him credit, he's not worried about retribution, maybe he's too old, he's
PISSED!

And maybe things were better when Walter Yetnikoff ran Sony Music.
Because it was about the music more than the trappings.

This guy is larger than life. Not with airs, like Clive Davis. Or faux
hipness, I'm just a guy from the street, like Jimmy Iovine. Rather,
Walter's got CHARISMA! You want more, you want to hang with this guy.

Watch this and tell me if you feel otherwise.

A breath of fresh air.

http://www.artistshousemusic.org/videos/an+interview+with+former+cbs+hea
d+walter+yetnikoff+full+session



--
Visit the archive: http://lefsetz.com/wordpress/
--
If you would like to subscribe to the LefsetzLetter,
http://www.lefsetz.com/lists/?p=subscribe&id=1
If you do not want to receive any more LefsetzLetters,
http://lefsetz.com/lists?p=unsubscribe&uid=b75a45dde856cc42f5e7673641bf3
05d

////////////////////////////////////////////////////////






http://muxtape.com/



///////////////




http://www.cafepress.com/



////////////////


Classic cupcakes
5 out of 5
Rate this

* Print
* Email
* Reviews
* Save
* Larger
* Smaller

Makes

12
Ingredients

* 2 cups self-raising flour, sifted
* 3/4 cup caster sugar
* 3/4 cup milk
* 125g butter, melted, cooled
* 2 x 59g eggs, beaten
* 1 teaspoon Queen Natural Vanilla Essence
* Sprinkles and lollies, to decorate
*
Icing
* 1 1/2 cups pure icing sugar
* Pink food colouring, optional
* 1 to 1 1/2 tablespoons water

Method

1. Preheat oven to 200°C. Grease a 12 x 1/3-cup capacity muffin pan. Alternatively, line holes with paper cases. Combine flour and caster sugar in a bowl. Make a well in the centre.
2. Add milk, butter, eggs and vanilla to flour mixture. Using a large metal spoon, stir gently to combine.
3. Spoon mixture into prepared muffin pan. Bake for 12 to 15 minutes, or until a skewer inserted into the centre comes out clean. Stand in pan for 5 minutes before transferring to a wire rack to cool.
4. Make icing: Sift icing sugar into a bowl. Add food colouring and water. Stir until smooth and well combined. Spoon icing over cupcakes. Decorate with sprinkles and lollies.

Source

Super Food Ideas - March 2004 , Page 74
Recipe by Dixie Elliott
Add this recipe to:
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////



////////////////////////

Chromatics :: RUNNING UP THAT HILL ::





///////////////////////////////

Francoise Hardy - L'amitie



/////////////


the torch

inflation*** is it reall- L'amitie -------- food/petrol/ and how goes up

2020 - 2020 cricket - vision - summit

////////////
Peggy Lee:Is That All There Is?

No comments: